Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

July 22 2012

Failure can be an option | James Dyson

Success is overrated. Losing out on the sports field and in the office can spur us on to greater things

At school they might teach you it's the taking part not the winning that counts, but I doubt that is the mantra in the Olympic village. With the nation's hopes resting on Team GB's broad shoulders, most people really want an uncomplicated win, a resounding success at first attempt. Failure is disappointing, shameful, definitive.

I disagree. Failure, coupled with perseverance, can be the springboard to better things. For example, I expect that Oscar Pistorius, the double amputee athlete running the 400m for South Africa, has something to say about overcoming setbacks. The 2007 ban preventing him from competing against able-bodied athletes has been overturned, and he will be in London this year.

Success takes time, patience and perseverance – not just in track and field. Exactly 5,126 attempts to make the first bagless vacuum cleaner were failures – some catastrophic disappointments, some minor defects. It took 15 years. Prototype 5,127 was the success. During the past 20 years I have fought countless legal battles to protect years of work. Most of the time we are successful. Occasionally we fail. It is a painful process but it spurs me on to invent more.

In the digital age of "overnight" success stories such as Facebook, the hard slog is easily overlooked. More often than not, success is the result of months and years of consecutive all-nighters. Trial and error, setback after setback. Failure is painful, but it spurs on improvement like nothing else.

And yet, we try increasingly hard to avoid failure these days. More schools are holding sports days without winners and losers. The approaching exam results are once again expected to outperform last year's, threatening to render many students' genuine achievement meaningless in the eyes of many people. I myself scraped seven poor passes at O-level. I had, and still have, little patience for rote learning the "right" answer. Instead, I excelled at creating things – inventing and art. Without understanding where my strengths were, I might not have found my way to the hub for designers, engineers and scientists that is London's Royal College of Art. Like all good educational institutions, it was a place for trial and error, wrong thinking and frustration but also triumph and achievement.

My own experience with failure at college is part of the reason I now advocate design and technology in schools. D&T is an arena for making mistakes, and slowly crafting successes – getting your hands on materials and tools, taking things apart just to see how they work. Not just the incubator for would-be Edisons, D&T teaches perseverance – sketch, build, test, rebuild. Only 10% of students take D&T at GCSE; this falls to 4% at A-level. Its long-term future as a core subject remains uncertain. I do not accept that young people aren't interested in D&T – it just needs to be reinvigorated, brought up to date.

The current emphasis on rote learning right answers over inventiveness and practical skills rewards regurgitation over intellect and instinct. Pretending there are no winners and losers in school sports undermines achievement. But far more importantly, it crushes the incentive to improve, and does not prepare young people for the trials ahead. In school, let us reward those high achievers but, with a closer look, we can also applaud those failures who give every clue of going on to win even bigger. Changes to the education system are necessary and long overdue.

The keen sting of failure should not be shunned. It can spur on greatness, the cue to persist against the odds. Keep an eye out for the athletes who don't make it to the podium this year. They may hold gold in Rio 2016. © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

April 21 2011

Sticks and stones: can architects be built in the classroom?

The government wants your advice on rebuilding the cultural curriculum. So how would you nurture the Frank Lloyd Wrights of the future?

Frank Lloyd Wright, one of the greatest architects of the 20th century, learned the beginnings of his craft by playing with wooden building blocks. Many other architects did, too. But Wright was one of the very few architects who spoke thoughtfully, throughout his life, about childhood. Many architects since have been embarrassed by their youthful ways, and have presented themselves as fully fledged artists and professionals mature beyond their years.

And yet, one of the big problems in Britain – a country infamous for its visual illiteracy, or so say outsiders – is that architecture isn't taught to children, not much in the home, and much less at school. What an all-embracing discipline it is, though, for teachers and pupils alike: a fusion of art, maths, geometry, geography, physics, technology, politics, economics and environmental concerns.

So it is encouraging to see the government taking architectural education seriously. Ed Vaizey, the culture minister, has asked Darren Henley, managing director of Classic FM, to lead a review of cultural education. In launching the review, Vaizey stressed the point that all young people should have opportunities to take part in performance and visual arts and learn about Britain's cultural, architectural and film heritage.

Working with the Museums Association, Henley is asking anyone interested in his review to make submissions here by 20 May about how best to expand the cultural curriculum. If you are interested in nurturing an understanding of architecture in up-and-coming generations, send in your suggestions: the government might just act on them.

So how should an understanding and appreciation of architecture be approached in schools? Building blocks aside, how can we nurture not just the Frank Lloyd Wrights of the future but a public who will push these budding architects, rather than sniping from the sidelines that all modern buildings are terrible?

Children are naturally interested in architecture. Give them a stack of paper and ask them to draw a house, or ask them to build a sandcastle, and they will be very happy. They will enjoy making houses out of cardboard boxes, twigs, leaves, mud or stones. These creative skills should be encouraged beyond early education, because children have an innate understanding of the idea of shelter and dwellings, and they know how to make the buildings they create special. Architecture is itself a game, a high game of playing with forms (along with geometries, tricks of light and, of course, plans), and the greatest of all architects have never ceased to play; their sense of invention has been as fecund as a child's.

Teaching architectural interpretations of history is also a good jumping-off point. If you can interpret a building, of whatever place or era, you can read history. Children revel in tales of Egyptian tombs, pyramids, palaces, castles and magical homes: it is only a short gap between these delights, these fantasies and the whole world of architecture.

An appreciation of architecture doesn't mean that a child has to become an architect – a slow and expensive profession to enter – but it could, if only it was more widespread in Britain, make future generations feel more able to spur on, or deter, the best and worst architectural proposals, and even to commission intelligent architecture that will benefit everyone, from low-cost housing to spectacular art galleries.

Our desire to build, both to provide shelter and to celebrate who we are and what we dream of, is innate. Rather than complaining about contemporary architecture in a passive and ill-informed way, we should offer future generations the space to think how they might like to shape their world – the world of buildings that humans will always need. That might well begin, playfully, in the classroom. © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!