About
Abbrev:..oAnth.....Motto:...'Nothing to Hide'.#25c3/#CCC.:.. Den Nachgeborenen ein
gemahnendes Vorbild & zur bleibenden Erinnerung - Loc: München (Munich - Germany).
..............................................................................................................................
Intended: a caleidoscope of repostings, feeds & direct postings in EN....DE....FR..
Selected entries from oAnth are provided via scoop.it - oAnth miscellaneous .........
..............................................................................................................................
Start of active postings on this Tumblelog Diary [microblogging -- WP] on Jan 2009,
nonetheless a great number of earlier entries are indirectly implemented via RSS-feeds.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selection by entry types - starting with the latest. . . . links. . . texts. . . quotes. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . files . . . videos . . . images . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
See likewise . . . . . . . >> 02myTagManual . . . . . . >> latest compilations . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Links & feeds to my Posterous-account are protected - pls use password: oA:acc_
:: at twitter >> 02mytwi01 ... diaspora* >> oAnth ... friendfeed >> 02myffeed01 ::
..............................................................................................................................
............ ABOUT THE ACTUAL SOUP.IO STATUS - - - latest entry 2012-03-27 ...........
2012-05-08 - oAnth: during the coming days I will hardly be capable for personal online
aktivities - only RSS import will be provided, if soup.io works regulary.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
May 10 2012
Commerce Weekly: The competitive push toward mobile payment
Here are a few of this week's stories from the commerce space that caught my eye.
Mobile payments are coming, one way or another
The New York Times (NYT) took a look this week at the push toward mobile payments and the various paths toward that end. The push isn't only coming from a consumer desire for a mobile wallet, but also from the payment companies. The NYT's post reports:
"Merchants are facing heavy pressure to upgrade their payment terminals to accept smart cards. Over the last several months, Visa, Discover and MasterCard have said that merchants that cannot accept these cards will be liable for any losses owing to fraud."
This could be the push needed for mobile payment, at least in the U.S., to get over the technology hump that has thus far been hindering it from catching on. Jennifer Miles, executive vice president at payment terminal provider VeriFone, told the NYT, "Everybody is going to be upgrading ... Before the credit card companies made their announcements, almost no merchants were buying terminals with smart card and NFC capabilities." She says VeriFone no longer installs payment terminals without NFC readers.
NFC technology, however, not only requires upgrades from merchants, but also consumers. The post reviews mobile payment solutions from PayPal and Square, noting the directive for these two companies may be more consumer centric:
"Both PayPal and Square say that asking customers to buy NFC-enabled phones and wait for merchants to install new hardware is folly. Neither company says it has plans to incorporate NFC into its wallet."
This consumer-centric approach might be part of what's behind VeriFone's announcement this week that it would jump into the payment processing fray. Bloomberg reports:
"VeriFone Systems Inc. (PAY), the largest maker of credit-card terminals, will offer an attachment that lets mobile devices accept credit and debit cards, making a deeper push into a market pioneered by Square Inc. and EBay Inc. (EBAY)'s PayPal ... VeriFone's version will allow partners such as banks to customize the service to transmit coupons and loyalty points to consumers, said Greg Cohen, a senior vice president at San Jose, California-based VeriFone."
VeriFone's system will work with Apple and Android mobile devices.
X.commerce harnesses the technologies of eBay, PayPal and Magento to create the first end-to-end multi-channel commerce technology platform. Our vision is to enable merchants of every size, service providers and developers to thrive in a marketplace where in-store, online, mobile and social selling are all mission critical to business success. Learn more at x.com.MasterCard releases PayPass
MasterCard announced its new PayPass Wallet Services this week. The company describes the global service in a press release:
PayPass Wallet Services delivers three distinct components — PayPass Acceptance Network (PayPass Online and PayPass Contactless), PayPass Wallet and PayPass API. These services enable a consistent shopping experience no matter where and how consumers shop, as well as a suite of digital wallet services, and developer tools to make it easier to connect other wallets into the PayPass Online acceptance network.
In other words, it's designed to work with any sort of digital wallet used by its partners. According to the release, American Airlines and Barnes & Noble are in the initial group of merchant partners.
One of the big differences between MasterCard's system and those of its competitors is its open nature. PC World reports:
What sets MasterCard's offering apart from digital wallet systems announced by Visa, Google, PayPal and others is how much the company is opening up its platform to third parties, said Gartner wireless analyst Mark Hung. Banks and other partners will be able to adopt PayPass Wallet Services in two different ways: They can use MasterCard's own service under their own brand or just use the company's API (application programming interface) to build their own platform.
Mobile payment readiness, global edition
How ready is the world for mobile payments? MasterCard has that covered this week, too. In a guest post at Forbes, vice president of MasterCard Worldwide Theodore Iacobuzio wrote about the launch of the MasterCard Mobile Payments Readiness Index (MPRI), a data-driven survey of the mobile payments landscape. Iacobuzio says the index "assesses and ranks 34 global economies in terms of how ready (or not) they are for mobile payments of three types":
- M-commerce, which is e-commerce conducted from a mobile phone or tablet.
- Point-of-Sale (POS) mobile payments where a smart phone becomes the authentication device to complete a transaction at checkout.
- Person-to-Person (P2P) mobile payments that involve the direct transfer of funds from one person to another using a mobile device.
Iacobuzio says that "one of the top-level findings is that unless all constituents — banks, merchants, telcos, device makers, governments — collaborate on developing new solutions and services, the mainstream adoption of mobile payments will be slower, more contentious and more expensive." He discusses the needs for mobile payments around the world, including in developed, developing and emerging countries.
But who's ready? The following image is a screenshot of the index summary. Note that no country has yet hit the "inflection point":

A screenshot of the MasterCard Mobile Payments Readiness Index (MPRI). Click here to access the full site.
Dan Rowinski at ReadWriteWeb has a nice analysis of the index. In part, he says much of the finance world, including MasterCard, may be viewing the mobile payment situation through "rose-colored glasses":
"For instance, why do mobile payments skew heavily toward young males in developed countries? The answer, more or less, is because it is cool. The actual need for mobile payments (NFC or otherwise) is not as clear in the U.S. as it is in other countries, like Kenya and Singapore."
Mobile shopping needs faster carts
Michael Darnaud, CEO of i-Cue Design, proposed a solution this week for one of the major problems with mobile shopping: speed, or lack thereof. In a post at Mobile Commerce Daily, he says the steps to a purchase simply take too long because of the number of data transfers involved:
"Just clicking a button to 'add,' 'delete' or 'change quantity' on the mobile Web requires sending transaction data from the shopper's mobile device to the vendor's server — average three to five seconds — via cell towers, not high-speed cables. These interim steps, long before checking out, are the challenge — it is all about time."
"Time is money" is no joke in mobile commerce. Darnaud notes: "A recent Wall Street Journal article declared that sales at Amazon increase by 1 percent for every 100 milliseconds it shaves off download times." To that end, he suggests an improvement to online cart technology that "reduces the time it takes to 'add,' 'delete' or 'change quantity' by virtually 100 percent because it eliminates the need for a server call for each of those commands." He describes his solution:
"This 'instant-add' cart solution requires nothing but familiar HTML and JavaScript. It is an incremental change that can be inserted into virtually any new or existing cart.
And what that means to a customer arriving at your site on the mobile Web is that he or she can see a product, click 'add to cart' and have no forced page change or reload or waiting time at all as a result."
Darnaud also notes the "elegance" of the solution: "... it forms a perfect bridge between desktop and mobile Web. The reason is simply that it works identically on both, via the browser."
Tip us off
News tips and suggestions are always welcome, so please send them along.
Related:
- Mobile payments and the consumer experience
- Jason Grigsby and Lyza Danger Gardner on mobile web design
- Mobile web development isn't slowing down
- The state of speed and the quirks of mobile optimization
- More Commerce Weekly coverage
May 08 2012
May 03 2012
May 02 2012
The UK's battle for open standards
Many of you are probably not aware, but there is an ongoing battle within the U.K. that will shape the future of the U.K. tech industry. It's all about open standards.
Last year, the Cabinet Office ran a consultation on open standards covering 970 CIOs and academics. The result of this consultation was a policy (PDF) in favour of royalty-free (RF) open standards in the U.K. I'm not going to go through the benefits of open standards in this space, other than to note that they are essential for the U.K.'s future competitive position, for spurring on innovation and creating a level playing field within the tech field. For those who wish to read more on this subject, Mark Thompson, the only academic I know to have published a paper on open standards in a quality peer reviewed journal, has provided an excellent overview.
Normally, I put these battles into an historical context, and I certainly have a plethora of examples of past industries attempting to lobby against future change. However, to keep this short I'll simply note that the incumbent industry has reacted to the Cabinet Office policy with attempts to redefine open standards to include non-open FRAND (fair, reasonable and non discriminatory) licenses and portray some sort of legitimate debate of RF versus FRAND, which doesn't exist.
Whilst this is clearly wrong and underhanded, there's another story I wish to focus on. It relates to the accusations that the meetings have been filled with "spokespeople for big vendors to argue in favour of paid-for software, specifically giving advocates of FRAND the chance to argue that free software on RF terms would be a bad thing" as reported by TechWeek Europe.
The back story is that since the Government policy on open standards was put in place, the Cabinet Office was pressured into a u-turn and running another consultation by various standards bodies and other vested interests. The arguments used were either fortuitous misunderstandings of the policy or willful misinformation in favour of current business interests. The Cabinet Office then appeared to relent to the pressure and undertake a second set of consultations. What happened next shows the sorry behaviour of lobbyists in our industry.
"Software patent heavyweights piled into the first public meeting," filling the room with unrepresentative views backed up by vendors flying in senior individuals from the U.S. It apparently seems that the chair of the roundtable was himself a paid lobbyist working on behalf of those vested interests, a fact that he forgot to mention to the Cabinet Office. Microsoft has now been "accused of trying to secretly influence government consultation."
What's surprising is that the majority of this had been uncovered by two journalists — Mark Ballard at Computer Weekly and Glyn Moody — who work mainly outside the mainstream media. In fact, the mainstream media has remained silent on the issue, with the notable exception of The Guardian.
The end result of the work of these two journalists is that the Cabinet Office has had to extend the consultation and, as noted by The Guardian, "rerun one of its discussion roundtables after it found that an independent facilitator of one of its discussions was simultaneously advising Microsoft on the consultation."
So, we have two plucky journalists who stand alone uncovering large corporations that are bullying Government to protect profits worth hundreds of millions. Our heroes' journey uncovers gerrymandering, skullduggery, rampant conflicts of interests, dubious ethics and a host of other sordid details and ... hold on, this sounds like a Hollywood script, not real life. Why on earth isn't mainstream media all over this, especially given the leaked Bell Pottinger memo on exploiting citizen initiatives?
The silence makes me wonder whether investigative journalism into things that might matter and might make a positive difference doesn't sell much advertising? Would it help if the open standards battle had celebrity endorsement? Alas, that's not the case and the battle for open standards might have been extended, but it is still ongoing. This issue is as important to the U.K. as SOPA / PIPA were to the U.S., but rather than fighting against a Government trying to do something that harms the growth of future industry, we are fighting with a Government trying to do the right thing and benefit a nation.
If you're too busy to help, that's understandable, but don't ever grumble about why the U.K. Government doesn't do more to support open standards and open source. The U.K. Government is trying to make a difference. It's trying to fight a good fight against a huge and well-funded lobby, but it needs you to turn up.
The battle for open standards needs help, so get involved.
Related:
- Promoting Open Source Software in Government: The Challenges of Motivation and Follow-Through
- Cost is only part of the Gov 2.0 open source story
- With GOV.UK, British government redefines the online government platform
- Government IT's quiet open source evolution
May 01 2012
Utopia on a budget: A completely practical plan for regaining paradise
When you're selling dreams, the trick is to strike a balance between utopian promises and common sense.
A week ago today, a privately funded startup called Planetary Resources announced that it had embarked on a program to mine trillions of dollars' worth of precious metals and other resources from asteroids in space. The project is undeniably ambitious, yet in their press conference the company's executives took pains to emphasize the pragmatism of their approach. Exponential advances in technology now make it possible, said co-founder and co-chairman Peter Diamandis, for small companies to accomplish what once required the backing of governments or large corporations. Planetary Resources plans to deploy "swarms" of low-cost telescope satellites to find asteroids that are rich in water, platinum, and other assets, but relatively close to Earth. They will then be mined not by people but by robots.
To be sure, there's nothing modest about the profits Planetary Resources hopes to realize. There were also frequent mentions during the press conference of how the project's success would benefit all of humankind, not only by developing new supplies of diminishing resources but also by keeping alive the dream of space exploration itself. Still, the gee whiz factor was kept to a minimum. Diamandis even claimed at one point that he'd dreamed since he was a teenager of being an asteroid miner, which seemed to be taking pragmatism a bit too far. Surely a teenager can imagine more glamorous things to do in space than that.
The press conference's one truly utopian moment came in a comment from Planetary Resource's other co-founder and co-chairman, Eric Anderson. My guess is that he momentarily let his enthusiasm get the best of him when he let slip his vision of where, in the long run, this could be heading. "We see the future of Earth as a garden of Eden,"he said, "as a place where we take care of the Earth and protect the environment and we do our heavy industries and our mining and all that sort of stuff in space!"
Ah, the Garden of Eden. In truth that's what we've always been after, although we're less inclined to admit it today than we used to be. In 1833 a German immigrant named John Jacob Etzler published "The Paradise Within Reach of All Men," the first extended work of technological utopianism to appear in the United States. Follow my proposals for harnessing the elements with machines, Etzler declared, and within 10 years "everything desirable for human life may be had by every man in superabundance, without labor, and without pay; where the whole face of nature shall be changed into the most beautiful forms, and man may live in the most magnificent palaces, in all imaginable refinements of luxury ..." He went on.
Skepticism regarding technological miracles was less prevalent then than it is today. Even so, Etzler predicted that some would greet his proposals with ridicule, and he was right. Among them was Henry David Thoreau, who published, anonymously, a review of Etzler's book that was slyly humorous in parts, openly sarcastic in others. "Let us not succumb to nature," he wrote. "We will marshal the clouds and restrain the tempests; we will bottle up pestilent exhalations, we will probe for earthquakes, grub them up; and give vent to the dangerous gases; we will disembowel the volcano, and extract its poison, take its seed out. We will wash water, and warm fire, and cool ice, and underprop the earth. We will teach birds to fly, and fishes to swim, and ruminants to chew the cud. It is time we had looked into these things."
A similar exchange occurred in the mid 1970s when a Princeton physics professor named Gerard O'Neill came forward with his own proposal for mining asteroids. O'Neill envisioned a series of permanently inhabited, self-sustaining human colonies orbiting in deep space. Huge inter-connected cylinders, each encompassing a land area as large as 100 square miles, would accommodate, in addition to extensive mining operations, capacious living quarters, gardens, and recreation areas. Settlers would be attracted not only by the promise of employment, O'Neill said, but also by internal climate conditions equivalent to "quite attractive modern communities in the U.S. and in southern France." He added that, because levels of gravity could be varied within the cylinders, a short walk up a hillside could bring a resident to an area where "human-powered flight would be easy" and "sports and ballet could take on a new dimensions."
Government funding was still the way to go at that point, and O'Neill appeared before subcommittees of the House of Representatives and the Senate to present his ideas. Here, too, it seems clear the intention was to portray the project as entirely reasonable. Mentions of southern France and flying ballet dancers were exceptions; charts and graphs were the rule. What we're talking about, O'Neill testified, is "civil engineering on a large scale in a well-understood, highly-predictable environment."
Again, naysayers emerged. Stewart Brand solicited comments on the project for the Spring 1976 edition of "CoEvolution Quarterly," a spinoff of the "Whole Earth Catalog." Brand was an enthusiastic supporter, but many of his readers weren't. The writer, farmer and environmentalist Wendell Berry called O'Neill's proposals "an ideal solution to the moral dilemma of all those in this society who cannot face the necessities of meaningful change." E F. Schumacher, author of "Small Is Beautiful," wrote that he'd be happy to nominate several hundred people to ship into outer space immediately, so that the real work of saving the planet could proceed unimpeded.
Failing to find support in Congress, O'Neill's project faded away. Soon after that the personal computer industry began its remarkable rise in Silicon Valley, reinvigorating the idea that technology can change the world overnight, making a lot of people extremely rich in the process. No accident that many of Planetary Resources' investors acquired their fortunes digitally. When you have billions to spend, your dreams don't have to make sense.
Related:
April 26 2012
Design your website for a graceful fail
Websites go down. It happens. But in many cases it might be possible to deal with and explain a failure while keeping user frustration to a minimum.
Mike Brittain (@mikebrittain), director of engineering at Etsy, addressed the resilient user experience in our recent interview. Among his insights from the full interview (below):
- Designing an experience that can adapt to individual service failures and partial degradations requires an intermingling between software engineers, operations teams and product and design teams.
- Previous experience designing for cable-connected devices may skew our connectivity expectations when it comes to more fragile mobile networks.
Brittain will expand on these ideas and more in his keynote address "Building Resilient User Experiences" at Velocity 2012 in June.
Our full interview follows.
What is a "resilient" user experience — and what are a few of the main practices involved in ensuring an acceptable UX during an outage?
Mike Brittain: Resilient user experiences are adaptable to individual failure modes within the system — allowing users to continue to use the service even in a partially degraded scenario.
Large-scale websites are driven by numerous databases, APIs, and other back-end services. Without thoughtful application design, any failure in an individual service might bubble up as a generic "Server Error." This sort of response completely blocks the user from any further experience and has the potential to degrade the user's confidence in your website, software or brand.
Consider an article page on the New York Times' website. There is the primary content of the page: the body of the article itself. And then there are all sorts of ancillary content and modules, such as social sharing tools, personalization details if you're signed-in, comments, articles recommended for you, most emailed articles, advertisements, etc. If something were to go wrong while retrieving the primary content for the page — the article body — you might not be able to provide anything meaningful to the reader. But if one or more services failed for generating any of those ancillary modules, it's likely to have a much lower impact on the reader. So, a resilient design would allow for any of those individual modules to fail gracefully without blocking the reader from completing the primary action on the site — reading news.
Here's another example closer to my own heart: The primary action for visitors to Etsy is to find, review, and purchase handcrafted goods. A product page on Etsy.com includes all sorts of ancillary information and tools, including a mechanism for marking a product as a "favorite." If the Favorites system goes down, we wouldn't want to return an error page to the visitor. Instead, we would hide the tool altogether. Meanwhile, visitors can continue to find and purchase products during this degradation. In fact, many of them may be blissfully unaware that the feature even exists while it is unavailable.
In the DevOps culture, we see increasing intermingling of experience and knowledge between software engineers and operations teams. Engineers who understand well how their software is operated, and the interplay between various services and back-ends, often understand failure modes and can adapt. Their software and hardware architecture may take advantage of patterns like redundant services, failover services, or retry attempts after failures.
Resilient user experiences require further intermingling with product and design teams. Product design is focused almost entirely on user experience when the system is assumed to be working properly. So, we need to have product designers commingling with engineers to better understand individual failure modes and to plan for them.
Do these interface practices vary for desktops/laptops versus mobile or tablets?
Mike Brittain: These principles apply to any user interface. But as we move into using more mobile devices and networks, we need to consider the relative fragility of the network that connects our software (e.g. a smartphone app) to servers on the Internet.
Our design process may be hampered by our prior experiences in which computers and web browsers connected to the Internet by physical cables suffered relatively low network failure rates. As such, our expectations may be that the network is seldom a failure point. We're moving rapidly into a world where mobile software connects to back-end services over cellular data networks — not to mention that the handset may be moving at high speed by car or train. So, we need to design resilience into our UIs anywhere we depend on network availability for data.
Velocity 2012: Web Operations & Performance — The smartest minds in web operations and performance are coming together for the Velocity Conference, being held June 25-27 in Santa Clara, Calif.Save 20% on registration with the code RADAR20
How do you set up a front-end to fail gracefully?
Mike Brittain: Front-end could mean client-side, or it could refer to the forward-most server-side script in the request flow, which talks to other back-end services to generate the HTML for a web page. Both situations are valid for resilient design.
In designing resilient UIs, you expect failures in each and every back-end service. Examples might include connection failures, connection timeouts, response timeouts, or corrupted/incomplete data in a response. A resilient UI traps these failures at a low level and provides a usable response, rather than throwing a general exception that causes the entire page to fail.
On the client side, this could mean detecting failures in Ajax responses and allowing the user experience to continue unblocked, or by retrying after a given amount of time. This could be during page render, or maybe during a user interaction. Those familiar with Gmail may recognize that during periods of network congestion or back-end failures, the small status message that reads, "sending," when you send an email sometimes changes to "still trying …" or "offline." This is preferred over a general "failed to send email" after a single attempt.
Some general patterns for resilient UI include:
- Disable or hide features that are failing.
- Provide fallback (default) content in place of dynamic content or feature that cannot be reached or displayed.
- Avoid behaviors that block UI display or interaction.
- Detect service failures and allow for retries.
- Failover to redundant services.
Systems engineers may recognize these patterns in low-level services or protocols. But these patterns are not as familiar to front-end engineers, product developers, and designers — who plan more around success than around failure. I don't mean for that statement to be divisive, but I do think it's true of the current state of how we build software and how we build the web.
How do you make your community aware of a failure?
Mike Brittain: In the case of small failures, the idea is to obscure the failure in a way that it does not block the primary use case for the site (e.g. we don't shut down product pages because the Favorites service is failing). Your community may not need much communication around this.
When things really go wrong, you want to be upfront and clear about failures. Use specific terms, rather than general. Provide context of time and estimated time to resolution whenever possible. If you have a service that fails and will be unavailable until you restore data over a period of, say, three hours, it's better to tell your visitors to check back in three hours than to have them hammering the refresh button on their browser for 20 minutes as they build up frustration.
You want to make sure this information is within reach for your users. I actually think at Etsy we have some pretty good patterns for this. We start with a status blog that is hosted outside of our primary network and should be available even if our data center is unreachable. Most service warnings or error messages on Etsy.com will provide a link to this blog. And anytime we have a service outage posted to this blog, a service warning is automatically posted at the top of any pages within our community forums and anywhere else that members would go looking for help on our site.
In your Velocity 2012 keynote summary, you mention "validating failure scenarios with 'game days'." What's a game day and how does it work?
Mike Brittain: The term game day" describes an exercise that tests some failure scenario in production. These drills are used to test hypotheses about how our systems will react to specific failures. They also surface any surprises about how the system reacts while we are actively observing.
We do this in production because development, testing, and staging environments are seldom 100% symmetric with production. You may have different numbers of machines, different volumes of data, or simulated versus live traffic. The downside is that these drills will impact real visitors. The upside is that you build real confidence within your team and exercise your abilities to cope with real failures.
We regularly test configuration flags across our site to ensure that we haven't unwired configuration logic for features we have been patching or improving. We also want to confirm that the user experience degrades gracefully when the flag is turned off. For example, when we disable the Favorites service on our site, we expect reads and writes to the data store to stop and we would expect various parts of the UI to hide the Favorites tools. Our game day would allow us to prove these out.
We would be surprised to find that disabling Favorites causes entire pages on the site to fail, rather than to degrade gracefully. We would be surprised if some processes continued to read from or write to the service while the config flag was disabled. And we would be further surprised to find unrelated services failing outright when the Favorites service was disabled. These are scenarios that might not be observed by simulated testing outside of production.
This interview was edited and condensed.
Associated photo on home and category pages: 404 error message something went wrong by IvanWalsh.com, on Flickr
Related:
- How resilience engineering applies to the web world
- Failure Happens: A summary of the power outage at 365 Main
- You can't get away with a bad mobile experience anymore
- On a small screen, user experience is everything
- Missing maps and the fragility of digital information
April 18 2012
True in spirit: Why I liked "Captain America," but didn't like "John Carter"
This post originally appeared in Tim O'Reilly's Google+ feed.
In my recent review of "John Carter," I damned the movie for failing to be true to the book, taking liberties with the story and with the character of John Carter himself. Yet when watching "Captain America" on the plane the other day, I found myself completely satisfied despite that fact that it too was unfaithful to the original in many ways.
I asked myself why, and concluded that the answer is central to understanding O'Reilly's brand marketing, and by extension the authenticity that is at the heart of all great brands.
For me as a young reader, the appeal of "Captain America" (as with "Spider-Man" and other Marvel comics) was the notion that a nerd, a kid who wasn't good at sports and was scorned by popular society, could be transformed into a hero. His smarts, his will, his character were what mattered — all that was required was a chance spark that would transform him into who he really was inside.
The movie version of "Captain America" is completely true to this fantasy. The character of Steve Rogers is so right that I was willing to forgive the many changes to the story (e.g. that Bucky was not his young sidekick but his pre-transformation protector and military buddy), improbabilities such as that the notion of riding a zipline from a mountain down onto the roof of a fast-moving train begs the question of just how they strung that zipline. (I've done it, and it's non-trivial, and gets harder the longer the line.) These are the kinds of errors that I found offensive in "John Carter" but didn't mind at all in "Captain America." I found myself moved by scenes in the movie that demonstrated Steve Rogers' courage, his indomitable will, his loyalty to friends — hell, his nobility. Exactly what Andrew Stanton took away from "John Carter"!
This was equally true in the second installment of "Sherlock Holmes," which I likewise saw on a plane last week. It takes even more liberties with Conan Doyle's original stories than "John Carter" took with Burroughs. Yet once again I consumed it with relish! Why? Because the character of Holmes was so true — his incredible ability to observe tiny details, to think ahead, his remarkable strength (which features in only a few of the stories, but is there nonetheless), his flawed character. And even though the character of Watson was nothing like the Watson of Doyle's stories, I forgave the director, because he made Watson better, not worse than the original.
This notion of understanding the essence of what matters about a book, a story, a character, also applies to business.
I think about the common thread that runs through all the books we created at O'Reilly — however different they might be. Consider the range of treatment shown by books as diverse as "Linux in a Nutshell," "Programming Perl," "Unix Power Tools," "The Perl Cookbook," "Head First Java," "Mac OS X: The Missing Manual," or "Make: Electronics." From the point of view of external details, each of these books was a radical departure from what had gone before, and therefore a potential opportunity to confuse customers and dilute the brand.
Yet these books have a common essence: a practical bent, respect for the intelligence of the reader, a clear path to what you need to know, the authentic voice of experience, a willingness to take risks with new tools and new ideas that have been taken up by people on the cutting edge. When they stray from these core features, our books fail.
O'Reilly conferences display the same brand essence. In their deepest core, an O'Reilly book and an O'Reilly technical conference have more in common than a technical book from O'Reilly and those from some of our competitors. Like many of our pioneering books, our most successful new conferences were launched because we thought they were needed, not because we necessarily knew how successful they'd be. We weren't chasing dollars; we were trying to help the early adopter communities who are our core customers to change the world.
(Of course, it also helped that we created "brand affordances" whenever we introduced a new type of book. I remember in the old days hearing that competitors would cheer every time we put out a new book without an animal on the cover. They thought we were throwing away our brand advantage. Little did they know that we were preserving it. Over time, we created a house of powerful brands with a common core but with clearly visible differences and distinct audiences.)
This brand essence is also true in our advocacy. We stand up for issues that matter in our industry. We tackle big problems that we don't yet know how to solve, and try to grow markets in ways that benefit others besides ourselves.
Hmmm. Maybe that's why I hated "John Carter" but loved "Captain America" and "Sherlock Holmes." Andrew Stanton's John Carter was a self-absorbed adventurer, a reluctant hero and an anti-romantic, not the noble figure I remembered from my childhood.
There's a way in which the O'Reilly brand essence is ultimately a story about the hacker as hero, the kid who is playing with technology because he loves it, but one day falls into a situation where he or she is called on to go forth and change the world. Our editors and conference chairs, our authors and our conference presenters, are drawn from the ranks of our customers, and like all true nerds, we have a secret hunger to be heroes.
See comments and join the conversation about this topic at Google+.
Related:
April 12 2012
Strata Week: Add structured data, lose local flavor?
Here are a few of the data stories that caught my attention this week:
A possible downside to Wikidata

Screenshot from the Wikidata Data Model page.
The Wikimedia Foundation — the good folks behind Wikipedia — recently proposed a Wikidata initiative. It's a new project that would build out a free secondary database to collect structured data that could provide support in turn for Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. According to the proposal:
"Many Wikipedia articles contain facts and connections to other articles that are not easily understood by a computer, like the population of a country or the place of birth of an actor. In Wikidata, you will be able to enter that information in a way that makes it processable by the computer. This means that the machine can provide it in different languages, use it to create overviews of such data, like lists or charts, or answer questions that can hardly be answered automatically today."
But in The Atlantic this week, Mark Graham, a research fellow at the Oxford Research Institute, takes a look at the proposal, calling these "changes that have worrying connotations for the diversity of knowledge in the world's sixth most popular website." Graham points to the different language editions of Wikipedia, noting that the encyclopedic knowledge contained therein is always highly diverse. "Not only does each language edition include different sets of topics, but when several editions do cover the same topic, they often put their own, unique spin on the topic. In particular, the ability of each language edition to exist independently has allowed each language community to contextualize knowledge for its audience."
Graham fears that emphasizing a standardized, machine-readable, semantic-oriented Wikipedia will lose this local flavor:
"The reason that Wikidata marks such a significant moment in Wikipedia's history is the fact that it eliminates some of the scope for culturally contingent representations of places, processes, people, and events. However, even more concerning is that fact that this sort of congealed and structured knowledge is unlikely to reflect the opinions and beliefs of traditionally marginalized groups."
His arguments raise questions about the perceived universality of data, when in fact what we might find instead is terribly nuanced and localized, particularly when that data is contributed by humans who are distributed globally.
The intricacies of Netflix personalization
Netflix's recommendation engine is often cited as a premier example of how user data can be mined and analyzed to build a better service. This week, Netflix's Xavier Amatriain and Justin Basilico penned a blog post offering insights into the challenges that the company — and thanks to the Netflix Prize, the data mining and machine learning communities — have faced in improving the accuracy of movie recommendation engines.
The Netflix post raises some interesting questions about how the means of content delivery have changed recommendations. In other words, when Netflix refocused on its streaming product, viewing interests changed (and not just because the selection changed). The same holds true for the multitude of ways in which we can now watch movies via Netflix (there are hundreds of different device options for accessing and viewing content from the service).
Amatriain and Basilico write:
"Now it is clear that the Netflix Prize objective, accurate prediction of a movie's rating, is just one of the many components of an effective recommendation system that optimizes our members' enjoyment. We also need to take into account factors such as context, title popularity, interest, evidence, novelty, diversity, and freshness. Supporting all the different contexts in which we want to make recommendations requires a range of algorithms that are tuned to the needs of those contexts."
Fluent Conference: JavaScript & Beyond — Explore the changing worlds of JavaScript & HTML5 at the O'Reilly Fluent Conference (May 29 - 31 in San Francisco, Calif.).Save 20% on registration with the code RADAR20
Got data news?
Feel free to email me.
Related:
- How Netflix handles all those devices
- A new challenge looks for a smarter algorithm to improve healthcare
April 10 2012
Carsharing saves U.S. city governments millions in operating costs
One of the most dynamic sectors of the sharing economy is the trend in large cities toward more collaborative consumption — and the entrepreneurs have followed, from Airbnb to Getable to Freecycle. Whether it's co-working, bike sharing, exchanging books and videos, or cohabiting hackerspaces and community garden spaces, there are green shoots throughout the economy that suggest the way we work, play and learn is changing due to the impact of connection technologies and the Great Recession.
This isn't just about the classic dilemma of "buy vs. rent." It's about whether people or organizations can pool limited resources to more efficiently access tools or services as needed and then pass them back into a commons, if appropriate.
Speaking to TechCrunch last year, Lauren Anderson floated the idea that a collaborative consumption revolution might be as "significant as the Industrial Revolution." We'll see about that. The new sharing economy is clearly a powerful force, as a recent report (PDF) by Latitude Research and Shareable Magazine highlighted, but it's not clear yet if it's going to transform society and production in the same way that industrialized mass production did in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Infographic from "The New Sharing Economy" study. Read the report (PDF) and
see a larger version of this image.
Carsharing is saving
What is clear is that, after years of spreading through the private sector, collaborative consumption is coming to government, and it's making a difference. A specific example: Carsharing via Zipcar in city car fleets is saving money and enabling government to increase its efficacy and decrease its use of natural resources.
After finally making inroads into cities, Zipcar is saving taxpayers real money in the public sector. Technology developed by the car-sharing startup is being used in 10 cities and municipalities in 2012. If data from a pilot with the United States General Services Agency fleet pans out, the technology could be also adopted across the sprawling federal agency's vehicles, saving tens of millions of dollars of operating expenses though smarter use of new technology.
"Now the politics are past, the data are there," said Michael Serafino, general manager for Zipcar's university and FastFleet programs, in a phone interview. "Collaborative consumption isn't so difficult from other technology. We're all used to networked laser printers. The car is just a tool to do business. People are starting to come around to the idea that it can be shared."
As with many other city needs, vehicle fleet management in the public sector shares commonalities across all cities. In every case, municipal governments need to find a way to use the vehicles that the city owns more efficiently to save scarce funds.
The FastFleet product has been around for a little more than three years, said Serafino. Zipcar started it in beta and then took a "methodical approach" to rolling it out.
FastFleet uses the same mechanism that's used throughout thousands of cars in the Zipcar fleet: a magnetized smartcard paired with a card reader in the windshield that can communicate with a central web-based reservation system.
There's a one-time setup charge to get a car wired for the system and then a per-month charge for the FastFleet service. The cost of that installation varies, predicated upon the make of vehicles, type of vehicles and tech that goes into them. Zipcar earns its revenue in a model quite similar to cloud computing and software-as-a-service, where operational costs are billed based upon usage.
Currently, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Santa Cruz, Calif., Boston, New York and Wilmington, Del. are all using FastFleet to add carsharing capabilities to their fleets, with more cities on the way. (Zipcar's representative declined to identify which municipalities are next.)
Boston's pilot cut its fleet in half
"Lots of cities have departments where someone occasionally needs a car," said Matthew Mayrl, chief of staff in the Boston Public Works department, during a phone interview.
"They buy one and then use it semi-frequently, maybe one to two times per week. But they do need it, so they can't give up the car. That means it's not being used for highest utilization."
The utilization issue is the key pain point, in terms of both efficiency and cost. Depending on the make and model, it generally costs between $3,000 and $7,000 on average for a municipality to operate a vehicle, said Serafino. "Utilization is about 30% in most municipal fleets," he said.
That's where collaborative consumption became to relevant to Boston. Mayrl said Boston's Public Works Department talked to Zipcar representatives with two goals in mind: get out of a manual reservation system and reduce the number of cars the city uses, which would reduce costs in the process. "Our public works was, for a long time, administered by a city motor pool," Mayrl said. "It was pretty old school: stop by, get keys, borrow a car."
While Boston did decide to join up with Zipcar, public sector workers aren't using actual Zipcars. The city has licensed Zipcar's FastFleet technology and is adding it to the existing fleet.
One benefit to using just the tech is that it can be integrated with cars that are already branded with the "City of Boston," pointed out Mayrl. That's crucial when the assessing office is visiting a household, he said: In that context, it's important to be identified.
Boston started a pilot in February that was rolled out to existing users of public works vehicles, along with two pilots in assessing and the Department of Motor Vehicles. The program started by taking the oldest cars off the road and training the relevant potential drivers. Using carsharing, the city of Boston was able to reduce the number of vehicles in the pilot by over 50%.
"Previously, there were 28 cars between DPW [the Public Works department] and those elsewhere in the department," said Mayrl. "That's been cut in half. Now we have 12 to 14 cars without any missed reservations. This holds a lot of promise, only a month in. We don't have to worry about maintenance or whether someone is parked in the wrong place or cleaning snow off a car. We hope that if this is successful, we can roll it out to other departments."
The District's fleet gets leaner
While a 50% reduction in fleet size looks like significant cost savings, Serafino said that a 2:1 ratio is actually a conservative number.
"We strive for 3:1," Serafino said. "The one thing we have is data. We capture and gather data from every single use of every single vehicle by every single driver, at a very granular level, including whenever a driver gets in and out. That allows a city to measure real utilization and efficiency. Using those numbers, officials can drive policy and other things. You can take effective utilization and real utilization and say, 'we're taking away these four cars from this area.' You can use hard data gathered by the system to make financial and efficiency decisions."
Based upon the results to date, Serafino said he expects Washington, DC, to triple its investment in the system. "The original pilot was started by a mandated reduction by [former DC Mayor Adrian] Fenty, who said 'make this goal,' and 'get it done by this date.' Overall, DC went from 365 to 80 vehicles by consolidating and cooperating."
Serafino estimated the reduction represents about 50% of the opportunity for DC to save money. "The leader of the DC Department of Public Works wants to do more," he said. "The final plans are to get to a couple of hundred vehicles under management, resulting in another reduction by at least 200 cars." Serafino estimated potential net cost savings would be north of $1 million per year.
There is a floor, however, for how lean a city's car fleet can become — and a ceiling for optimal utilization as well.
"The more you reduce, the harder it gets," said Serafino. "DC may have gone too far, by going down to 80 [vehicles]. It has hurt mobility." If you cut into fat deep enough, in other words, eventually you hit muscle and bone.
"DC is passing 70% utilization on a per-day basis," said Serafino. "They have three to four people using each of the cars every day. The trip profile, in the government sense, is different from other customers. We don't expect to go over 80%. There is a point where you can get too lean. DC has kind of gotten there now."
In Boston, Mayrl said they did a financial analysis of how to reduce costs from their car fleet. "It was cheaper to better manage the cars we have than to buy new ones. Technology helps us do that. [Carsharing] had already been done in a couple of other cities. Chicago does it. The city of DC does it. We went to a competitive bid for an online vehicle fleet management software system. [Zipcar] was the only respondent."
Given that FastFleet has been around for more than three years and there's a strong business case for employing the technology, the rate of adoption by American cities might seem to be a little slow to outside observers. What would be missing from that analysis are the barriers to entry for startups that want to compete in the market for government services.
"What hit us was the sales cycle," said Zipcar's Serafino. "The average is about 18 months to two years on city deals. That's why they're all popping now, with more announcements to come soon."
The problem, Serafino mused, was not making the case for potential cost savings. "Cities will only act as sensitive as politics will allow," said Serafino.
"Boston, San Francisco, New York and Chicago are trying. The problem is the automotive and vehicle culture," Serafino said. "That, combined with the financial aspects of decentralized budgeting for fleets, is the bane of fleet managers. Most automotive fleet managers in cities don't control their own destinies. Chicago is one of the very few cities where they can control the entire fleet.
Cities do have other options to use technology to manage their car fleets, from telematics providers to GPS devices to web-based reservation systems, each of which may be comparatively less expensive to buy off the shelf.
One place that Zipcar will continue to face competition at the local level is from companies that provide key vending machines, which are essentially automated devices on garage walls.
"You go get a key and go to a car," said Serafino. "If you have 20 cars in one location, it's not as likely to make sense to choose our system. If you have 50 cars in three locations, that's a different context. You can't just pick up a keybox and move it."
Collaborative consumption goes federal?
Zipcar is continuing along the long on-ramp to working with government. The next step for the company may be to help Uncle Sam with the federal government's car fleet.
As noted previously, the U.S. General Services Agency (GSA) has already done a collaborative consumption pilot using part of its immense vehicle fleet. Serafino says the GSA is now using that data to prepare a broader procurement action for a request for proposals.
The scale for potential cost savings is significant: The GSA manages some 210,000 vehicles, including a small but growing number of electric vehicles.
Given congressional pressure to find cost savings in the federal budget, if the GSA can increase the utilization of its fleet in a way that's even vaguely comparable to the savings that cities are finding, collaborative consumption could become quite popular in Congress.
If carsharing at the federal level succeeded similarly well at scale, members of Congress and staff that became familiar with collaborative consumption through the wildly popular Capital bike sharing program may well see the sharing economy in a new light.
"There's a broader international trend to work to share resources more efficiently, from energy to physical infrastructure," said Mayrl. "Like every good city, we're copying the successful stuff elsewhere."
Related:
- It's a time-sharing world
- Why businesses need to embrace sharing and open systems
- Measuring the economic impact of the Sharing Economy
- Lisa Gansky, "The Mesh: Why the Future of Business is Sharing"
- A future of cities fueled by citizens, open data and collaborative consumption
April 05 2012
Strata Week: New life for an old census
Here are a few of the data stories that caught my attention this week
Now available in digital form: The 1940 census
The National Archives released the 1940 U.S. Census records on Monday, after a mandatory 72-year waiting period. The release marks the single largest collection of digital information ever made available online by the agency.

Screenshot from the digital version of the 1940 Census.
The 1940 Census, conducted as a door-to-door survey, included questions about age, race, occupation, employment status, income, and participation in New Deal programs — all important (and intriguing) following the previous decade's Great Depression. One data point: in 1940, there were 5.1 million farmers. According to the 2010 American Community Survey (not the census, mind you), there were just 613,000.
The ability to glean these sorts of insights proved to be far more compelling than the National Archives anticipated, and the website hosting the data, Archives.com, was temporarily brought down by the traffic load. The site is now up, so anyone can investigate the records of approximately 132 million Americans. The records are searchable by map — or rather, "the appropriate enumeration district" — but not by name.
A federal plan for big data
The Obama administration unveiled its "Big Data Research and Development Initiative" late last week, with more than $200 million in financial commitments. Among the White House's goals: to "advance state-of-the-art core technologies needed to to collect, store, preserve, manage, analyze, and share huge quantities of data."
The new big data initiative was announced with a number of departments and agencies already on board with specific plans, including grant opportunities from the Department of Defense and National Science Foundation, new spending on an XDATA program by DARPA to build new computational tools as well as open data initiatives, such as the the 1000 Genomes Project.
"In the same way that past Federal investments in information-technology R&D led to dramatic advances in supercomputing and the creation of the Internet, the initiative we are launching today promises to transform our ability to use big data for scientific discovery, environmental and biomedical research, education, and national security," said Dr. John P. Holdren, assistant to the President and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in the official press release (PDF).
Personal data and social context
When the Girls Around Me app was released, using data from Foursquare and Facebook to notify users when there were females nearby, many commentators called it creepy. "Girls Around Me is the perfect complement to any pick-up strategy," the app's website once touted. "And with millions of chicks checking in daily, there's never been a better time to be on the hunt."
"Hunt" is an interesting choice of words here, and the Cult of Mac, among other blogs, asked if the app was encouraging stalking. Outcry about the app prompted Foursquare to yank the app's API access, and the app's developers later pulled the app voluntarily from the App Store.
Many of the responses to the app raised issues about privacy and user data, and questioned whether women in particular should be extra cautious about sharing their information with social networks. But as Amit Runchal writes in TechCrunch, this response blames the victims:
"You may argue, the women signed up to be a part of this when they signed up to be on Facebook. No. What they signed up for was to be on Facebook. Our identities change depending on our context, no matter what permissions we have given to the Big Blue Eye. Denying us the right to this creates victims who then get blamed for it. 'Well,' they say, 'you shouldn't have been on Facebook if you didn't want to ...' No. Please recognize them as a person. Please recognize what that means."
Writing here at Radar, Mike Loukides expands on some of these issues, noting that the questions are always about data and social context:
"It's useful to imagine the same software with a slightly different configuration. Girls Around Me has undeniably crossed a line. But what if, instead of finding women, the app was Hackers Around Me? That might be borderline creepy, but most people could live with it, and it might even lead to some wonderful impromptu hackathons. EMTs Around Me could save lives. I doubt that you'd need to change a single line of code to implement either of these apps, just some search strings. The problem isn't the software itself, nor is it the victims, but what happens when you move data from one context into another. Moving data about EMTs into context where EMTs are needed is socially acceptable; moving data into a context that facilitates stalking isn't acceptable, and shouldn't be."
Fluent Conference: JavaScript & Beyond — Explore the changing worlds of JavaScript & HTML5 at the O'Reilly Fluent Conference (May 29 - 31 in San Francisco, Calif.).Save 20% on registration with the code RADAR20
Got data news?
Feel free to email me.
Related:
Commerce Weekly: The do's and don'ts of geo marketing
Here's what caught my eye in the commerce space this week.
Placecast's CEO on the secret to successful targeted offers
Last August, I wrote about Placecast, which has been working to deliver coupons and offers on behalf of its retail clients to opted-in customers when they hit geofenced areas. Placecast's platform allows merchants to set up a ring around their locations (or other locations, as described below) and then trigger an SMS to customers who have opted in to receive them. Placecast works with mobile carriers to deliver large tranches of opted-in customers to its merchant clients. This week at O'Reilly's Where Conference, Placecast CEO Alistair Goodman talked about the right and wrong way to deliver ads to a geofenced audience, based on the learning curve they have climbed over the past few years.
Some of these are obvious, like the need to link data about the customers' preferences with the location — the richer the data, the more relevant the message, and the more likely it is to hit home. Goodman explained this as a sort of stack, with positioning data (mostly from GPS, but supplemented with Wi-Fi and other data) at the lowest level. Just above that, a layer on context: What type of place is the user at (mall? stadium? park?) and what's the weather like? Atop that level, demographics and psychographics — who are the users and what do users in their consumer categories tend to go for? Atop that layer, the users' preferences: What do they want to be notified about, when, and how often? And finally, at the top of the stack, the offer itself: What is it the retailer is promoting?
A second key point is the need to find relevant locations — not just the retailer's store, which is obvious, but other places where the customer is likely to be receptive to the offers. For example, you might promote dog food or pet stores at a dog park, or a promo for a sports drink around a gym, or the sponsor of a concert around an arena. Interestingly, Goodman said that while merchants often ask Placecast to geofence around a competitor's store, he advises them that isn't a particularly effective marketing strategy: "If a customer is already headed into a certain store, a message urging them to visit a different location isn't likely to be very effective. A more effective way is to promote the message from a relevant public space." (I noticed the audience received this wisdom in total silence; you could almost hear the wheels of doubt spinning.)
Finally, Goodman said customers react better to offers when they believe it comes to them through this channel with some level of exclusivity. "Customers like it when they feel they're getting an offer that others aren't getting." So the coupons or other offers can't be the same as what's posted on the window of the store.
Goodman said the platform can deliver offers through a variety of channels, but most are delivered as SMS text messages, which remain tremendously effective. And they seem to be working: Goodman said that their research finds that 49% of store visits that occurred after receiving a Placecast ShopAlert were unplanned before the alert, while another 19% served as reminders to visit the store. In these cases, you might say those texts delivered twice.
X.commerce harnesses the technologies of eBay, PayPal and Magento to create the first end-to-end multi-channel commerce technology platform. Our vision is to enable merchants of every size, service providers and developers to thrive in a marketplace where in-store, online, mobile and social selling are all mission critical to business success. Learn more at x.com.Jumping ship at Google Wallet?
The departure of Google Wallet co-founding engineer Rob von Behren to join payments startup Square aroused suspicion that Square might be looking to incorporate NFC in its system. Dan Balaban's article in NFC Times puts von Behren's departure in the context of a swath of high profile talent exits from a project that appears to be struggling to find partners and users. Balaban quotes a mobile commerce analyst who believes von Behren's joining Square almost certainly means a move by Square to support NFC. "Else, it would be like hiring Michael Jordan to get advice on golf," the analyst said.
In the past, Square's COO Keith Rabois has questioned the value of NFC, calling it, at last September's GigaOM Mobile Conference, "a technology in search of a value proposition." But as more mobile phones ship this year with the short-range wireless technology, it seems natural that Square would want to tap into it to facilitate its "Pay with Square" (formerly Card Case) system that allows customers to pay at merchants with their Square accounts.
Meanwhile, Balaban's article raises questions about the viability of the Google Wallet project. In addition to von Behren, fellow founding engineer Jonathan Wall and product lead Marc Freed-Finnegan left to start their own mobile-commerce startup, Tappmo, in March. Andrew Zaeske, former director of engineering for Wallet, is also said to have left the project. Speculation centers around disagreements between Wallet chief Osama Bedier (who joined Google from PayPal in February 2011) and other leaders of the team over the project's direction. It can't help that the refusal last autumn of Verizon to allow Google Wallet into its phones, and Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile's plans to launch their own mobile wallet under the Isis brand, cast into doubt whether Wallet will ever be able to expand beyond the Sprint network.
Will carriers like Facebook's post-IPO status?
Mobile carriers run the risk of losing text revenue from Facebook, as more of the service's users access it from mobile devices and use it as their primary communication channel. That's the view of Victor Basta, managing director of London-based Magister Advisors, which advises companies on acquisitions and public offerings. Basta told Bloomberg BusinessWeek that "Facebook's IPO is about the worst thing that could happen to network operators" since the pressure to demonstrate strong earnings to investors will make it harder for Facebook to share revenue with the carriers. Facebook's "over-the-top" service rides on the mobile networks, failing to share any of the revenue from advertising delivered over it and increasingly taking away from the carriers' SMS text earnings, as users send free Facebook messages instead.
"The fundamental challenge for network operators will be finding a way of becoming part of the Facebook ecosystem rather than simply external enablers," Basta said.
Tip us off
News tips and suggestions are always welcome, so please send them along.
If you're interested in learning more about the commerce space, check out DevZone on x.com, a collaboration between O'Reilly and X.commerce.
Related:
- The rise of location-triggered offers
- Square upgrades Card Case with geofences
- Google juices its Wallet
- More Commerce Weekly coverage
April 04 2012
April 01 2012
What is smart disclosure?
Citizens generate an enormous amount of economically valuable data through interactions with with companies and government. Earlier this year, a report from the World Economic Forum and McKinsey Consulting described the emergence of personal data as of a new asset class." The value created from such data does not , however, always go to the benefit of consumers, particularly when third parties collect it, separating people from their personal data.
The emergence of new technologies and government policies has provided an opportunity to both empower consumers and create new markets from "smarter disclosure" of this personal data. Smart disclosure is when a private company or government agency provides a person with periodic access to his or her own data in open formats that enable them to easily put the data to use. Specifically, smart disclosure refers to the timely release of data in standardized, machine readable formats in ways that enable consumers to make better decisions about finance, healthcare, energy or other contexts.
Smart disclosure is "a new tool that helps provide consumers with greater access to the information they need to make informed choices," wrote Cass Sunstein, the U.S. administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), in a post on smart disclosure on the White House blog. Sunstein delivered a keynote address at the White House Summit on smart disclosure at the U.S. National Archives on Friday. He authored a memorandum providing guidance on smart disclosure guidance from OIRA in September 2011.
Smart disclosure is part of the final United States National Action Plan for its participation in the Open Government Partnership." Speaking at the launch of the Open Government Partnership in New York City last September, the president specifically referred to the role of smart disclosure in the United States:
"We’ve developed new tools -- called 'smart disclosures' -- so that the data we make public can help people make health care choices, help small businesses innovate, and help scientists achieve new breakthroughs," said President Obama. "We’ve been promoting greater disclosure of government information, empowering citizens with new ways to participate in their democracy," said President Obama. "We are releasing more data in usable forms on health and safety and the environment, because information is power, and helping people make informed decisions and entrepreneurs turn data into new products, they create new jobs."
In the months since the announcement, the U.S. National Science and Technology Council established a smart disclosure task force dedicated to promoting better policies and implementation across government.
"In many contexts, the federal government uses disclosure as a way to ensure that consumers know what they are purchasing and are able to compare alternatives," wrote Sunstein at the White House blog. "Consider nutrition facts labels, the newly designed automobile fuel economy labels, and ChooseMyPlate.gov. Modern technologies are giving rise to a series of new possibilities for promoting informed decisions."
Smart disclosure is a "case of the Administration asking agencies to focus on making available high value data (as distinct from traditional transparency and accountability data) for purposes other than decreasing corruption in government," wrote New York Law School professor Beth Noveck, the former U.S. deputy chief technology officer for open government, in an email. "It starts from the premise that consumers, when given access to information and useful decision tools built by third parties using that information, can self-regulate and stand on a more level playing field with companies who otherwise seek to obfuscate." The choice of Todd Park as United States CTO also sends a message about the importance of smart disclosure to the administration, she said.
The United Kingdom's “midata” smart disclosure initiative is an important smart disclosure case study outside of the United States. Progress there has come in large part because the UK has a privacy law that gives citizens the right to access their personal data held by private companies, unlike the United States. In the UK, however, companies have been complying with the law in a way that did not realize the real potential value of that right to data, which is to say that a citizen could request personal data and it would arrive the mail weeks later at a cost of a few dozen pounds. The UK government has launched a voluntary public-private partnership to enable companies to comply with the law by making the data available online in open formats. The recent introduction of the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights from the White House and Privacy Report from the FTC suggests that such rights to personal data ownership might be negotiated, in principle, much as a right to credit reports have been in the past.
Four categories of smart disclosure
One of the most powerful versions of smart disclosure is when data on products or services (including pricing algorithms, quality, and features) is combined with personal data (like customer usage history, credit score, health, energy and education data) into "choice engines" (like search engines, interactive maps or mobile applications) that enable consumers to make better decisions in context, at the point of a buying or contractual decision. There are four broad categories where smart disclosure applies:
- When government releases data about products or services. For instance, when the Department of Health and Human Services releases hospital quality ratings, the Security and Exchange Commission releases public company financial filings in machine-readable formats at XBLR.SEC.gov, or the Department of Education puts data about more than 7,000 institutions online in a College Navigator for prospective students.
- When government releases personal data about a citizen. For instance, when the Department of Veterans Affairs gives veterans access to health records using at the "Blue Button" or the IRS provides citizens with online access to their electronic tax transcript. The work of BrightScope liberating financial advisor data and 401(k) data has been an early signal of how data drives the innovation economy.
- When a private company releases information about products or services in machine readable formats. Entrepreneurs can then use that data to empower consumers. For instance, both Billshrink.com and Hello Wallet may enhance consumer finance decisions.
- When a private company releases personal data about usage to a citizen. For instance, when a power utility company provides a household access to its energy usage data through the Green Button or when banks allowing customers to download their transaction histories in a machine readable format to use at Mint.com or similar services. As with the Blue Button for healthcare data and consumer finance, the White House asserts that providing energy consumers with secure access to information about energy usage will increase innovation in the sector and empower citizens with more information.
An expanding colorwheel of buttons
Should smart disclosure initiatives continue to gather steam, citizens could see “Blue Button”-like and "Green Button"-like solutions for every kind of data government or industry collects about citizens. For example, the Department of Defense has military training and experience records. Social Security and the Internal Revenue Service have the historical financial history of citizens, such as earnings and income. The Department of Veterans Affairs and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have personal health records.
More "Green Button"-like mechanisms could enable secure, private access to private industry collects about citizen services. The latter could includes mobile phone bills, credit card fees, mortgage disclosures, mutual fund fee and more, except where there are legal restrictions, as for national security reasons.
Earlier this year, influential venture capitalist Fred Wilson encouraged entrepreneurs and VCs to get behind open data. Writing on his widely read blog, Wilson urged developers to adopt the Green Button.
"This is the kind of innovation that gets me excited," Wilson wrote. "The Green Button is like OAuth for energy data. It is a simple standard that the utilities can implement on one side and web/mobile developers can implement on the other side. And the result is a ton of information sharing about energy consumption and in all likelihood energy savings that result from more informed consumers.
When citizens gain access to data and put it to work, they can tap it to make better choices about everything from finance to healthcare to real estate, much in the same way that Web applications like Hipmunk and Zillow let consumers make more informed decisions.
"I'm a big fan of simplicity and open standards to unleash a lot of innovation," wrote Wilson. "APIs and open data aren't always simple concepts for end users. Green Buttons and Blue Buttons are pretty simple concepts that most consumers will understand. I'm hoping we soon see Yellow Buttons, Red Buttons, Purple Buttons, and Orange Buttons too. Let's get behind these open data initiatives. Let's build them into our apps. And let's pressure our hospitals, utilities, and other institutions to support them."
The next generation of open data is personal data, wrote open government analyst David Eaves this month:
I would love to see the blue button and green button initiative spread to companies and jurisdictions outside the United States. There is no reason why for example there cannot be Blue Buttons on the Provincial Health Care website in Canada, or the UK. Nor is there any reason why provincial energy corporations like BC Hydro or Bullfrog Energy (there's a progressive company that would get this) couldn't implement the Green Button. Doing so would enable Canadian software developers to create applications that could use this data and help citizens and tap into the US market. Conversely, Canadian citizens could tap into applications created in the US.
The opportunity here is huge. Not only could this revolutionize citizens access to their own health and energy consumption data, it would reduce the costs of sharing health care records, which in turn could potentially create savings for the industry at large.
Data drives consumer finance innovation
Despite recent headlines about the Green Button and the household energy data market, the biggest US smart disclosure story of this type is currently consumer finance, where there is already significant private sector activity going on today.
For instance, if a consumer visits Billshrink.com, you can get personalized recommendations for a cheaper cell phone plan based on your calling history. Mint.com will make specific recommendations on how to save (and alternative products to use) based on an analysis of the accounts it is pulling data from. Hello Wallet is enabled by smart disclosure by banks and government data. The sector's success hints at the innovation that's possible when people get open, portable access to their personal data in a a consumer market of sufficient size and value to attract entrepreneurial activity.
Such innovation is enabled in part because entrepreneurs and developers can go directly to data aggregation intermediaries like Yodlee or CashEdge and license the data, meaning that they do not have to strike deals directly with each of the private companies or build their own screen scraping technology, although some do go it alone.
"How do people actually make decisions? How can data help improve those decisions in complex markets? Research questions like these in behavioral economics are priorities for both the Russell Sage Foundation and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation," said Daniel Goroff, a Sloan Program Director, in an interview yesterday. "That's why we are launching a 'Smart Disclosure Research and Demonstration Design Competition.' If you have ideas and want to win a prize, please send Innocentive.com a short essay. Even if you are not in a position to carry out the work, we are especially interested in finding and funding projects that can help measure the costs and benefits of existing or novel 'choice engines.'"
What is the future of smart disclosure?
This kind of vibrant innovation could spread to many other sectors, like energy, health, education, telecommunication, food and nutrition, if relevant data were liberated. The Green Button is an early signal in this area, with the potential to spread to 27 million households around the United States. The Blue Button, with over 800,000 current users, is spreading to private health plans like Aetna and Walgreens, with the potential to spread to 21 million users.
Despite an increasingly number of powerful tools that enable data journalists and scientists to interrogate data, many of even the most literate consumers do not look at data themselves, particularly if it is in machine-readable, as opposed to human-readable formats. Instead, they digest it from ratings agencies, consumer reports and guides to the best services or products in a given area. Increasingly, entrepreneurs are combining data with applications, algorithms and improved user interfaces to provide consumers with "choice engines."
As Tim O'Reilly outlined in his keynote speech yesterday, the future of smart disclosure includes more than quarterly data disclosure from the SEC or banks. If you're really lining up with the future, you have to think about real-time data and real-time data systems, he said. Tim outlined 10 key lessons his presentation, an annotated version of which is embedded below.
When released through smart disclosure, data resembles a classic "public good" in a broader economic sense. Disclosures of such open data in a useful format are currently under-produced by the marketplace, suggesting a potential role for government in the facilitation of its release. Generally, consumers do not have access to it today.
Well over a century ago, President Lincoln said that "the legitimate object of government is to do for the people what needs to be done, but which they cannot by individual effort do at all, or do so well, for themselves." The thesis behind smart disclosure in the 21st century is that when consumers have access to that personal data and the market creates new tools to put to work, citizens will be empowered make economic, education and lifestyle choices that enable to them to live healthier, wealthier, and -- in the most aspirational sense -- happier lives.
"Moving the government into the 21st century should be applauded," wrote Richard Thaler, an economics professor at the University of Chicago, in the New York Times last year. In a time when so many citizens are struggling with economic woes, unemployment and the high costs of energy, education and healthcare, better tools that help them invest and benefit from personal data are sorely needed..
March 30 2012
Patterns snap mobile app designs into place
In the following interview, "Mobile Design Pattern Gallery" author Theresa Neil (@theresaneil) discusses interface design trends, the one app design mistake that pops up again and again, and the apps that get UI right.
What are the most interesting trends you're seeing in mobile interface design?
Theresa Neil: I'm most interested in the trends that arise when app makers try to address a cross-device design strategy. For example, the Springboard pattern — a grid of icons acting as a launchpad — is a popular navigation pattern since it is "OS neutral." Meaning, it doesn't rely on bottom tabs like iOS and BlackBerry, or on top tabs like Android, Windows Mobile and Symbian. The Springboard pattern can be easily adapted for each operating system without feeling foreign or weird to the user.

The Springboard design pattern features a single page with multiple menu options. This pattern works well across mobile operating systems. (Screenshot from "Mobile Design Pattern Gallery.")
Your book includes UI "anti-patterns." What are those?
Theresa Neil: Anti-patterns are examples of mobile UI design patterns to avoid. Bill Scott, my co-author of "Designing Web Interfaces," has had a popular talk for many years featuring anti-patterns in web applications. We could just write off these examples as bad designs, but I think it is important to dig into them and figure out why they are bad.
What is the most common mobile UI mistake?
Theresa Neil: Anti-pattern no. 1 is "novel notions." Novel notions refer to designs that use a "novel" approach to a problem that could otherwise be solved with an existing pattern, a standard UI control, or a better metaphor.
This is not to say designers should dial back their creativity. Apps like Flipboard, Path and Clear have blazed a trail with novel solutions to navigation. But novel designs need to be rigorously tested and refined before being released. Just look at the reviews in the App Store: For every awesome app like Path, there are dozens of other apps that are rated one star for bad navigation or a confusing interface.
Which mobile apps have notable UI design?
Theresa Neil: Flipboard, Path, Clear — the typical superstars. But I also love Evernote, Trip Journal, Foursquare and Fring because these companies have done spectacular work with their app design strategies. For example, look at Foursquare on a BlackBerry, iPhone or a Windows 7 phone; the apps are optimized for each of the different operating systems, but they still feel like the same app.
Mobile Design Pattern Gallery — This book provides a reference to 70 mobile app design patterns, illustrated by more than 400 screenshots from current iOS, Android, BlackBerry, WebOS, Windows Mobile, and Symbian apps.This interview was edited and condensed.
Related:
- Mobile interfaces: Mistakes to avoid and trends to watch
- On a small screen, user experience is everything
- Buttons were an inspired UI hack, but now we've got better options
- Designing for the iPad: How it's different from the iPhone and what you need to consider
- UI is becoming an "embodied" model
March 29 2012
Commerce Weekly: Google Wallet vs Isis is coming soon
Here's what caught my eye in commerce news this week.
Who's got the winning wallet?
Several recent articles have speculated about the coming competition between Google Wallet and the forthcoming mobile wallet from Isis, which is set to debut in tests in Austin and Salt Lake City this summer. Tech bloggers love a contest, and even though there's only one major player in this race so far, observers are handicapping the players before they even take the field.
MobilePaymentsToday.com ran a column comparing the merits of the two platforms in several categories. (Where was the massive infographic that we've all grown used to for this sort of thing?) Google took the prize in time-to-market (already out there, a little) and branding, while the nod went to Isis for building a solid ecosystem, with its support from three major U.S. wireless carriers and the top credit card networks and handset builders. Isis should also get the award for most imaginative and compelling demo video, based on the clip of Cyber Illusionist Marco Tempest at SXSW a few weeks ago (demo begins 15 seconds in, after the ad):
Of course, both of these plays depend on NFC wireless capability in phones, and while that's destined to ramp up soon, GigaOm reported that in 2011, NFC in the U.S. lagged far behind other regions. Of the 30 million NFC-capable handsets sold worldwide last year, about five million went to North America, 10 million went to Europe, and more than that went to Asia. Some mobile wallets, of course, don't rely on NFC: PayPal, for example, is getting ready to launch an updated version of its wallet that operates closer to the direct billing model, where you enter your mobile number on the retailer's keypad and then confirm when a text is sent to your mobile. PayPal's system is a bit less elegant than wireless tap and pay, but as we wrote a few weeks ago, it's ready now and available on any phone that supports texting.
We couldn't help notice that all this handicapping of the two most visible mobile wallets overlooked the potential of a third player that has yet to enter the arena. Only a few weeks ago, mobile payment geeks were abuzz about newly published patents from Apple that described a method for payment with credit cards that sends the receipt to the user's iTunes account. And since there are more than 200 million of those iTunes accounts (and 350 million iOS devices out there), that represents a significant installed user base that may be receptive to Apple's familiar interface applied to a mobile wallet. Those who think Apple is coming late to the party should be reminded that Apple has never had to be the first to a market to end up dominating it.
X.commerce harnesses the technologies of eBay, PayPal and Magento to create the first end-to-end multi-channel commerce technology platform. Our vision is to enable merchants of every size, service providers and developers to thrive in a marketplace where in-store, online, mobile and social selling are all mission critical to business success. Learn more at x.com.In-app purchases continue to dominate
Here's more evidence that in-app purchases are driving most of the revenues in mobile apps. According to Inside Mobile Apps, Distimo, which specializes in tracking app store activity, reports that a majority of the top-grossing apps on iPad, iPhone and Android monetize with in-app purchases. The researcher found that, of the top 200 grossing apps in the iPad App Store, the iPhone App store, and the Google Play store in February, 74% of the iPad apps and 80% of the iPhone apps featured in-app purchases. The numbers are even more remarkable when taken with the additional insight that only 10% of all iPad apps and 6% of iPhone apps even offer in-app purchases. So, there appears to be an awful lot of iOS apps that aren't yet interested in playing in the winning game.
The number was lower on Android apps (56%). Inside Mobile Apps' Kathleen De Vere suggested that may be because Android has a shorter history with in-app purchases (only since last May) and, related, fewer Android apps offer in-app purchases.
The findings support other reports that have also suggested the superiority of the foot-in-the-door model, including one by Flurry Analytics last summer that found freemium emerging as the dominant model for generating revenue from mobile apps.
Tip us off
News tips and suggestions are always welcome, so please send them along.
If you're interested in learning more about the commerce space, check out DevZone on x.com, a collaboration between O'Reilly and X.commerce.
Related:
- Who will own your mobile wallet?
- Opening up the mobile wallet
- Report: Don't rush in-app purchases
- The economics of in-app purchases
- More Commerce Weekly coverage
March 27 2012
A huge competitive advantage awaits bold publishers
In the video interview below, Eric Ries (@ericries), author of "The Lean Startup," sits down with O'Reilly online managing editor Mac Slocum to talk about the lean startup method and how it applies to publishing. Ries argues:
"When you're publishing a new book or any piece of media, you're actually an entrepreneur, whether it says that on your business card or not. It doesn't matter if you're an editor, a publisher or an author, you are an entrepreneur." (Discussed at 00:23.)
Ries talks about the lengthy process of producing a book and the inefficient business practices behind the slow iteration speeds:
"When I signed my publishing contract, I asked for the expedited process, which I was told was about 18 months. In those 18 months, how much time was actually spent on the editorial production of the book itself? Very little time. Most of the time was either me waiting for my editor or him waiting for me. It was dealing with all the intricacies of the publishing process — the catalog, figuring out the marketing campaign, tons of activities that are all important, but have nothing to do with the actual production of the book. [The 18 months is about] fitting a zillion books — far too many — into this crazy waterfall process.
"The reason we call this 'lean startup' is because of an insight that happened in manufacturing called lean manufacturing. Working in these supposedly efficient silos, where everyone is in their department and the work product is passed from department to department seems very efficient, but it's actually radically inefficient. The first publisher to restructure their process around these [lean] principles is going to have a huge competitive advantage over their rivals." (Discussed at 5:04.)
Ries also says that "the one realization that has not hit publishing yet is that if you make content, you're in the software business … if you look at the supply chain, who's accumulating all the power? It's software companies like Apple, Amazon and Google." (Discussed at 6:43.)
For more on how the lean startup methodology applies to publishing, check out the full interview in the following video:
The future of publishing has a busy schedule.Stay up to date with Tools of Change for Publishing events, publications, research and resources. Visit us at oreilly.com/toc.
Associated photo on home and category pages: Eric Ries by O'Reilly Conferences, on Flickr
Related:
- The Lean Startup Talk From Web 2.0 Expo (Video)
- There's Plan A, and then there's the plan that will become your business
- Eric Ries keynote address from TOC 2012
- What publishing can learn from tech startups
- What investors are looking for in publishing companies
March 26 2012
March 23 2012
My Paleo Media Diet
I've been on a train to New York City for about 20 minutes and it just occurred to me that I haven't checked Twitter today. In fact, I sat on a bench in the station for 30 minutes without even touching my phone. I watched people walk by, I daydreamed, thought about my plans for tomorrow, stared at the ceiling and generally just sort of zoned out. That would be no big deal except that later I realized I didn't get that itchy urge to check my phone and do the circuit: email, Twitter, Yammer, G+, Email, Twitter, Yammer, G+ … my little socmed treadmill.
That's huge! This is the first time I can remember sitting down somewhere in at least three years without immediately feeling the urge, or more like compulsion, to pull out my phone and twiddle with it. And this was at the train station, for 30 minutes! I feel like a smoker just realizing that I forgot to light up when I stepped outside for an afternoon break.
For too long I've been killing time on that treadmill, which would be fine if I had time that needed killing, but that's rarely the case. Plus, once that circuit gets started it tends to keep on going well into time that really should be better used. After a while I began feeling like I was never really present anywhere. Whether I was riding the train, sitting at dinner, watching a movie, whatever … every few minutes I'd get that tug. "See if there's a pellet. Give the bar a push."
Maybe you'll scoff at this, but I'm an addict. I have been for a long time, and I'm sick of it. I'm tired of having the attention span of a meth addict. I'm tired of reaching for my phone at every red light because the urge has been building inexorably since the last one. I'm irritated that my first impulse after any real world human experience is to tweet it. What the hell? Narcissist much?
I'm tired of walking down busy sidewalks full of interesting people and places with my head down staring at a rectangle. I want to be present, in the moment and the place. I want to experience mental flow by the river full and I want to be more productive. And above all, I want to nurture the relationships I have with people that I actually see and touch in all of their materialized-in-atoms glory.
If you have never experienced addiction, be happy. This post isn't for you. But I'm addicted to those little bursts of pleasure that pile into my inbox, or are prefaced with an "@" in my stream. Each one a new affirmation. "You mean something to someone" they seem to say. Although they needn't even say that to adequately stimulate. A Skinner Box really doesn't take much. Hell, I'd probably reach for my phone if it actually dropped little pellets from a chute.
If you've read Clay Johnson's thought provoking book "The Information Diet" you know that he describes his diet in terms of infoveganism. While I get what he means by that, I think it's the wrong analogy, at least as it relates to my addiction. Going vegan is a moral choice. An approach to food designed to satisfy first and foremost the conscience. Which makes a lot of sense in the context of government and political ideology in which he uses it. But my problem isn't one of extremism, or TMZ, or empty calorie media of any kind. Most of the pellets I chomp are just fine, probably even nutritious. It's the fact that I immediately crave the next one so much that is driving me crazy.
So a few weeks ago I decided to take advantage of a mini-sabbatical and go paleolithic. I guess I'll call it the Paleo Media Diet because for me it's not about the content per se, but its medium of conveyance. The medium is the message, and the stimulant.
I'm not doing this to satisfy my conscience, I'm doing it to satisfy evolution. Or more specifically, my evolutionary state. If my ancient and maladaptive wiring, that evolved in a different time, can't resist the lever and the pellet, then I figured I was going to have to get rid of the damned lever. So I did.
Now I own the world's dumbest smart phone. I removed all of the "social" apps - Yammer, Twitter, G+, LinkedIn, Path ... all gone. I open up preferences and turn off "cellular data" for long stretches of each day. If there is a specific email I'm waiting for I'll go through the multiple steps to turn it on and check, otherwise data stays turned off. I'll get my mail when I'm at my computer, with intention. But I turn my computer off when I'm not actively using it too, and leave it off for most of each day. The first time I turn it on is at lunch. I don't check anything electronic in the morning — that was the first thing I needed to stop. Compulsively checking messages before brushing my teeth is just ridiculous.
If I'm using my computer to write (like right now) I turn off the Wi-Fi. Sometimes I turn it off at the router to make it a little bit more difficult to "just check that one thing." In fact, maybe I'll make a T-shirt with this on it:

Who knows, maybe it will become the symbol of a movement.
Oh, also, out of a sense of new media / old media fairness I'm leaving the TV off too unless there is a specific thing I planned to watch. No more flicking it on to just see what's on. After all, for the first 30 years of my life we railed against the "tube" as a flood of stupid coming into our living rooms. There's no point in letting it off the hook now just because there is a new even raw'er media that has a pellet bar attached to it.
To fill the time I'm getting back I'm meeting people for coffee, drinks, dinner, whatever. I'm spending time face to face with old friends and making new ones. I'm going to great lengths to try to make my social interactions more "around the campfire" and less mediated by a glowing rectangle. I'm reading, a lot.
The inspiration for this change was simple. First, I was getting nothing done. My productivity had been decimated by my inability to focus for more than a few minutes at a time and I desperately had to do something about it. So when I had the chance to take a break from work I knew I had to detox, and more importantly, change my habits permanently. This can't be a temporary "cleanse." This has to be me taking control of my interactions with media again, for the long run. These new habits have to be ingrained before I get back to work and back in front of my computer all day.
Second, I started a paleo-inspired dietary regimen in December in response to a different set of addictions: sugars and gluten. I started following the Perfect Health Diet because it seemed reasonable that during the bulk of our evolutionary past we ate very differently than we do today. As a result, the way we are eating now is poorly aligned with our biology and is probably killing us. We simply haven't had enough time to adequately adapt to what we actually eat in the mere 10,000 or so years of agriculture. Especially as our recent style of agriculture is being warped by farm subsidies into producing huge quantities of cheap fructose.
With three months' worth of results I think there is something to the theory. It was brutal to get off of sugar. It took two painful weeks of feeling like my head was made of wood, but then it passed and I'm eating and feeling better than ever. Energy is up, weight and body fat are down and blood work is trending in all of the right directions.
Once that basic idea — that in the timeline of human history and pre-history we simply haven't had time to adapt to our new circumstances — took root in my brain it seemed natural to apply it to other domains besides food. I think "going paleo" is going to be the catch phrase of an emerging counter culture and it isn't going to mean just diet. For me, at this point, it means a variety of lifestyle choices that recognize the limitations of my physical self to adapt to modern life. My approach now is going to be: "Where I can, adapt to my surroundings, where I can't, adapt my surroundings to me."
I know that we've always worried about the development of new media and what impact it might have on our culture. "The loss of oral culture will devastate us" etc. etc. I know I run the risk of getting lumped in with Nicholas Carr and all of the other Internet pessimists. But really, that's not what I'm saying. I just believe that my brain is maladapted to the networked Skinner Box, so I want out. My brain is plastic, but not in a sufficiently adaptive way. In fact it's probably adapting just fine, but in a fashion that creates a destructive feed forward loop.
I'm not trying to get all Walden Pond on you, and many of you will no doubt see this as nothing more than faddish crazy talk, but I'm going to work really hard to be both present and informed. I'll keep taking advantage of networks to live a better and more productive life, just as soon as I get through the part of my transition that makes my head feel like wood, but they're not going to keep taking advantage of me. And well, if a paleo media diet sounds stupid, do what works for you. We're probably different. But I'm turning off, opting out, and disconnecting as much as I can to save my brain for more of the things I really want to use it for. I'll let you know how it goes.
Related:
- Skinner Box? There's an App for That
- Don't blame the information for your bad habits
- Into the wild and back again
- How has the Internet changed the way you think?
- Open question: What's the point of inbox zero?
March 22 2012
March 21 2012
Four questions about Microsoft with Mary Jo Foley
Mary Jo Foley (@maryjofoley) is the author of the "All About Microsoft" column at ZDNet . She does a great job at keeping people informed about the world of Microsoft and she wrote a book herself not so long ago titled "Microsoft 2.0: How Microsoft Plans to Stay Relevant in the Post-Gates Era."
I recently interviewed Foley about a number of Microsoft's moves. Highlights from our discussion included:
- Foley sees vertical opportunities for the Kinect SDK for Windows, from health care to education. Integrating the Kinect technology will also play a part in interacting with PowerPoint, ERPs and CRMs. [Discussed
10 seconds in.] - How has the rollout for Windows 8 been different from previous operating systems? "Beta" doesn't mean what it used to — Google, for example, has many products in perpetual beta — but Foley thinks there's more to the Windows 8 release than just that. The Windows 8 rollout is a signal of how Microsoft develops the OS now, with the company setting things in stone earlier than with previous software products. [Discussed at 2:41.]
- If you think Microsoft will loosen its grip on Metro design guidelines, think again. Foley pointed to Windows on ARM (WOA) as an example — there, Metro is the only choice. [Discussed at 4:39.]
- What would someone choose a Windows 8 tablet over an iPad or Android tablet? Foley said the competitive difference may lie in sleeker hardware and integration with Microsoft's Office suite.
[Discussed at href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODyKeX3x9C0#t=6m16s">6:16.]
You can view the entire interview in the following video.
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...

Baratunde Thurston: We went into this with a goal of significant pre-sales to hit the New York Times bestseller list. How many does it take to do that? Anywhere from 1,000 to 100,000 in sales, and it depends on what else has come out that week. The pre-sales all accrue to one week, so you can stack the deck. We had 20,000 pre-sales as a goal. That was insane. We wound up with several hundred pre-sales, which was helpful, but not a juggernaut. We hit the list at No. 21. Mostly, that was useful because The Times had me do a
This notion of showing the
Competition in the mobile payment space is heating up, as Square's payment pace closes in on PayPal's, according to
One of last week's big stories was a new interview question:
